In some cases, these iconic, and economically and ecologically important species, could lose upwards of 70% of suitable habitat by the end of the century, and in most cases, the impacts of these climate-induced changes are already observable.

"The ongoing and projected effects of climate change highlight the urgent need to adaptively and proactively manage dynamic marine ecosystems," according tothe study, "Widespread habitat loss and redistribution of marine top predators in a changing ocean," published in the journal Science Advances.

The study, led byCamrin Braun, an assistant scientist and marine ecologist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), identified areas offshore of the Southeast U.S. and Mid-Atlantic coasts as predicted hotspots of multi-species habitat loss. The researchers studied the impacts on three shark (blue, porbeagle, and shortfin mako), five tuna (albacore, bigeye, bluefin, skipjack, and yellowfin), and four billfish (sailfish, blue marlin, white marlin, and swordfish) species. Although the researchers' model framework could not account for potential adaptability or thermal tolerance by species, the results "suggest predominant and widespread habitat loss for nearly all [highly migratory species] studied."

"Climate change is expected to fundamentally change the status quo for where these species are and how they live. While we don't really understand all the details of what that fundamental change might look like, this study is a good step in the direction of trying to nail down what those changes might be, so that we can do something about it," said Braun.

Scientists used three decades of satellite, oceanographic model, and in situ biological data to develop dynamic species distribution models to assess how climate change has already and will continue to impact the fish species in the NWA and GOM.

"Our research demonstrates that climate-driven changes are happening now, not from projections of climate change, but based on observed empirical data from the last two decades. So while our findings do point to larger species shifts in the near term, it also clarifies the substantial changes in species distributions that have already occurred," said study co-authorRebecca Lewison. She is professor of biology and a conservation ecologist at the Coastal and Marine Institute at San Diego State University. She added that the research results "highlight the importance of using NASA and other satellite data to understand how a changing ocean is impacting commercially important marine species like swordfish and tunas."

The study "not only sheds more light on the far-reaching effects of climate change on ocean environments but highlights that marine conservation and management efforts need to plan for these ongoing changes. If migratory fish are on the move, fishing vessels and coastal communities will also need to adapt. Studies like this will help marine resource agencies be even more dynamic in their decision-making," said study co-author Tobey Curtis, a fishery management specialist in the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Management Division of NOAA Fisheries.

The shifts in the habitat and distributions of these species "raise concerns for associated fisheries and the socioeconomic impacts of climate change on fishing communities," according to the article. The concentrated changes in species distribution also "highlight the need for adaptive management approaches that can respond to expected changes." "Our results suggest static fishery management measures will continue to lose ecological relevance and economic efficacy as species redistribute under climate change." Braun said the motivation for the research is not only to better understand the fish and marine ecosystems, but also to understand how changes affect people, their livelihoods, coastal communities, and commercial fisheries.

"We are doing our best to try to figure out what will happen, so that people can adapt and so that we can develop climate-resilient or climate-ready management policies," Braun said.

He said that historic ways to manage fisheries are static, even though fish move around a lot. "We basically draw a box in the ocean and say whether you can or can't fish there," he said. Dynamic ocean management frameworks "must embody expected changes. Otherwise, you are left with your static box in the ocean that doesn't move, even though the fish may have moved, and the ocean may have changed."

Funding for this research was provided by a NASA Ecological Conservation program grant, the NOAA Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Program, the Postdoctoral Scholar Program at WHOI, and the Dr. George D. Grice Postdoctoral Scholarship Fund at WHOI.